Archive for the ‘News & Events’ Category

History of the Second Vermont Republic

Nearly three years before I moved to Vermont, on October 9, 1990, the Bennington Banner published my article entitled “Should the U.S. Be Downsized?”  Four years later in Challenge (Nov.-Dec. 1994) I wrote “The time has come both for the individual states and the federal government to begin planning the rational downsizing of America.”  Continuing I suggested that Vermont might lead the way by helping “save our nation from the debilitating effects of big government and big business” and by “providing an independent role model for the other states to follow.”

In 1997 William H. Willimon and I published Downsizing the U.S.A., which not only called for Vermont independence, but the peaceful dissolution of the American Empire.  We argued that the U.S. government had become too big, too centralized, too powerful, too undemocratic, too militaristic, too imperialistic, too materialistic, and too unresponsive to the needs of individual citizens and small communities.  However, since we were in the midst of the greatest economic boom in history, few Americans were interested in downsizing anything.  The name of the game was “up, up, and away.”  Only bigger and faster were thought to be better.

A year or so later I joined an organization called the New England Confederation whose objective was to have New England split away from the United States and establish itself as an independent nation-state.  Unfortunately, the Confederation turned out to be mostly an Internet website rather than a real political organization.  However, its website survived several years after the demise of the Confederation itself under the leadership of Bristol, Vermont resident Michael Patno.

For the most part, before September 11, 2001, my call for Vermont independence and the dissolution of the Empire fell on deaf ears.  It was as though I were speaking to an audience of one, namely myself.  But a year or so after 9/11 that gradually began to change.  On March 4, 2003, two weeks before the second war with Iraq began, Michael Patno and I met for lunch in Burlington to discuss the possibility of organizing a serious, nonviolent independence movement in Vermont opposed to the tyranny of the U.S. government, Corporate America, and globalization and committed to the return of Vermont to its status as an independent republic as it was between 1777 and 1791.  The following day I spoke at an anti-war rally at Johnson State College and decided to test-market the idea of an independent Vermont.

Basically my pitch to the students was, “If you want to prevent future wars in places such as Afghanistan and Iraq, we have no choice but to break up the United States into smaller regions, and that process should begin with Vermont declaring its independence from the United States.”  They were stunned, but they got it.  Their positive response literally provided the energy for Michael Patno and I to launch the Second Vermont Republic.

Ten days after the bombing began in Baghdad on March 19, 2003, we held the first of four monthly meetings at the Village Cup in Jericho to discuss how such a movement might evolve.  These meetings were attended by only a handful of people.  Early on we decided not to become a political party but rather a civic club.  The name “Second Vermont Republic” was proposed by Jeffersonville high school student Walker Brook and registered with the Secretary of State on June 19, 2003.

Over lunch in the backyard of the Bread & Puppet Theater Museum in Glover, Vermont on July 18, 2003, the puppeteers, under the leadership of Peter Schumann, agreed to cooperate with the Second Vermont Republic to promote Vermont independence.  Since the outset, the Lake Parker Country Store in West Glover has been a focal point of SVR activity.

In conjunction with the release of my book The Vermont Manifesto on October 11, 2003, the first statewide meeting of the Second Vermont Republic was held in the New Building of Bread & Puppet Theater in Glover.  The daylong meeting was attended by around fifty people.  Wes Hamilton served as facilitator.

About the idea of Vermont independence, Ambassador George F. Kennan said, “I see nothing fanciful, and nothing towards the realization of which the efforts of enlightened people might not be usefully directed.”  Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith added, “I must assure you of my pleasure in, and approval of, your views of the Second Vermont Republic.”  “From the standpoint of puppeteers and their subversive papier-mâché, the Second Vermont Republic sounds like a very good idea to fight the megalomania of the globalizers,” echoed Peter Schumann.

On November 16, 2003, the Times-Argus published the first major article on the Second Vermont Republic.  This was followed by Jay Walljasper’s piece in Utne on the Vermont independence movement.  Chicago based economist and SVR member David Hale proposed in The Burlington Free Press on January 6, 2004 that Vermont should secede from the United States and join the British Commonwealth.

On January 4, 2004, SVR’s website www.vermontrepublic.org came on stream with Sam Young of West Glover as webmaster.  In 2005 the website received an average of 3,000 unique visitors per month.  It was substantially revised by Rob Williams in July 2006.  Since August 2007 it has been managed by NEK Information Associates based in Glover, Vt.

Throughout the spring of 2004, we held monthly planning meetings at the Institute of Social Ecology in Plainfield.  Then on June 19th SVR and Bread & Puppet Theater held a parade in downtown Montpelier which originated in front of the Firehouse and proceeded six blocks to the steps of the State House.  Nearly 350 people attended the rally which followed in front of the State House.  It included a performance by Bread & Puppet, live music, and a dozen or so speakers calling for Vermont independence.  John Remington Graham, author of A Constitutional History of Secession, was the keynote speaker.  The rally ended with the reading of the Vermont Declaration of Independence.  Copies of the new 32-page, glossy Journal of Vermont Independence edited by David White were also distributed.  Nearly a year later, this journal evolved into Vermont Commons.

Two events which took place in November of 2004 put the Second Vermont Republic on the map, so to speak – statewide, nationally, and internationally.  They were the November 2nd re-election of George W. Bush and a conference sponsored by SVR in Middlebury, Vermont three days after the election.

On November 5-7 forty people from eleven states and England attended a conference at the Middlebury Inn co-sponsored by SVR and the Fourth World of Wessex, England entitled “After the Fall of America, Then What?”  The Fourth World, which published The Fourth World Review, a periodical inspired by Leopold Kohr and Fritz Schumacher, was committed to small nations, small communities, small farms, small shops, the human scale, and the inalienable sovereignty of the human spirit.  Speakers included Kirkpatrick Sale, Donald Livingston, Rober Allio, Frank Bryan, and Thomas H. Naylor.

The underlying premise of the conference was that the United States had become unsustainable, ungovernable, and unfixable.  If that were indeed the case, then do we go down with the Titanic or seek other alternatives?  Among the options discussed at Middlebury were denial, compliance, and political reform, proven to be deadends; revolution, rebellion, and implosion, equally problematic; and decentralization, devolution, and peaceful dissolution.  The conference also included a mock town meeting open to the public with guest appearances by Ethan Allen (Jim Hogue) and Thomas Jefferson (Gus Jaccaci).

At the close of the meeting over half of the delegates including Kirkpatrick Sale, Donald Livingston, and Thomas H. Naylor signed The Middlebury Declaration which called for the creation of a movement that would “place secession on the national agenda, encourage secessionist organizations, develop communication among existing and future secessionist groups, and create a body of scholarship to examine and promote the ideas and principles of secessionism.”  The Middlebury Institute headed by SVR member Kirkpatrick Sale is now engaged in the pursuit of these goals.

The combined effect of Bush’s re-election and the Middlebury Conference resulted in a significant increase in SVR’s membership, over 5,000 unique visits to our website in November, and an enormous amount of state, national, and international media attention. The Quebec newspaper Le Devoir published a front-page article on the conference.

As a follow-up to the Middlebury Conference, SVR held several meetings in Montpelier at the Langdon Street Café, a worker-owned collective which supports creative dialogue, sustainability, local products, and community.  Such a meeting was held on January 15, 2005 to commemorate the day in 1777 when Vermont declared its independence and became a separate republic for fourteen years.  Ethan Allen (Jim Hogue) again made a guest appearance.  One of the aims of the meeting was to promote the Vermont Independence Day Resolution being considered by the Vermont Legislature.  During the previous September SVR members Linda and John Whitney launched a statewide campaign calling for the Legislature to make January 15, 1777 Vermont Independence Day.

The resolution endorsed by Senator Jim Jeffords, Burlington Mayor Peter Clavelle, Lt. Governor Brian Dubie, and most members of the Vermont House and Senate was approved in an amended form in April.  By then it had become a resolution naming January as Vermont history and independence month.

Then on March 4, 2005, a memorial service was held at the Langdon Street Café led by Rev. Ben Matchstick of Bread & Puppet Theater and General Ethan Allen (Jim Hogue) commemorating the day in 1791 when Vermont joined the Union.  The service included a reading from Ecclesiastes with Chopin’s “Funeral March” playing in the background.  A funeral procession with a New Orleans-style funeral band carried the flag-draped coffin containing the deceased First Vermont Republic to the State House where it was placed at the foot of the statue of Ethan Allen.  The funeral received extensive statewide media coverage.

In April 2005 publisher Ian Baldwin, editor Rowan Jacobsen, and webmaster Dr. Rob Williams introduced an exciting print and online forum for exploring the idea of Vermont independence called Vermont Commons.  The print version is a twenty-four-page bi-monthly newspaper distributed to paid subscribers and 200 venues through Vermont.  Contributors to Vermont Commons have included Wendell Berry, Peter Clavelle, Kirkpatrick Sale, Bill McKibben, and James Howard Kunstler.  Utne Magazine named Vermont Commons the “Best New Publication in 2005.”  Rob Williams is now editor and publisher of Vermont Commons.

Thomas H. Naylor and Jim Hogue, who speaks French, participated in the fifteenth national Congress of the Parti Québécois in Quebec City on June 3-5 at the invitation of Vice Premiere Marie Malavoy. The invitation to the PQ Congress represented a form of political recognition of the Second Vermont Republic by a major political party in a neighboring country.

In 2005 SVR supporters participated in Fourth of July parades in Barton, Cabot, and Warren.  The politically radical, funky, grassroots, seat-of-the-pants Warren parade attracts as many as 20,000 people each year to the Mad River Valley.  The parade, whose homemade floats are held together by duct tape and baling twine, has no marching bands, only bands that march.  It combines New England Americana with vintage Vermont culture and the residual effects of 1960s hippie culture.  In the 2006 Warren parade, SVR had its own float.  The Warren parade has become an annual event in which to promote Vermont independence.

To celebrate the signing of the Vermont Constitution in 1777, SVR held a mock town meeting on the Constitution House lawn in Windsor, Vermont on July 9, 2005.  The meeting was led by Ben Matchstick and Rick Foley.  Participants received their own personal Vermont passport.  SVR appeared at this event again in 2006, which was covered by the Los Angeles Times.

On October 28, 2005, SVR held the first statewide convention on secession in the United States since North Carolina voted to secede from the Union on May 20, 1861.  The daylong event took place in the House Chamber of the State House in Montpelier.  Only in Vermont would such a meeting be possible.

Over 300 people heard keynote speaker James Howard Kunstler, author of The Long Emergency, warn that “the end of the cheap fossil fuel era will lead to the most serious challenge to our collective identity, economy, culture, and security since the Civil War.”  He further warned that “turbulence will be the rule” and that “all bets will be off for politics, economics, and social cohesion.”  Continuing he said, “the Federal government will be impotent and ineffectual – just as they were after Hurricane Katrina.”

He predicted that (1) American life will become intensely and profoundly local, (2) We will have to grow a lot more of our food in the regions where we live, and (3) We are going to have to reconstruct local economies, local networks of interdependency.  He also took note of the fact that Vermont is uniquely situated to meet the challenge of the cheap oil endgame because of its small towns, small businesses, small farms, and strong sense of community.

The objectives of the convention were twofold.  First, to raise the level of awareness of Vermonters of the feasibility of independence as a viable alternative to a nation which has lost its moral authority and is unsustainable.  Second, to provide an example and a process for other states and nations which may be seriously considering separatism, secession, independence, and similar devolutionary strategies.

Other convention speakers included Kirkpatrick Sale, author of Human Scale; Professor Frank Bryan, University of Vermont;  J. Kevin Graffagnino, Executive Director, Vermont Historical Society;  G. Roderick Lawrence, CEO, Stevenson Kellogg (Toronto); (Rev.) Ben T. Matchstick; and General Ethan Allen (aka Jim Hogue).  The meeting began after General Allen arrived at the State House on a black stallion named “Duke.”

Two resolutions were approved by the convention delegates in the concluding session.  One called for Vermont to return to its status as an independent republic as it had between January 15, 1777 and March 4, 1791.  The other called for the Second Vermont Republic to seek membership in the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization.

The convention attracted extensive statewide and national media attention.  It was covered by Burlington Free Press, Times Argus, Brattleboro Reformer, Seven Days, Vermont Guardian, Associated Press (state/national), Channel 3 News, WDEV, Vermont Public Radio, Christian Science Monitor, American Conservative, Boston Globe, and the Alex Jones Show.  The SVR website received nearly 10,000 unique visits during October.  The meeting was attended by a major gubernatorial candidate and several legislators.

During the spring of 2006 SVR launched a campaign to promote Vermont sovereignty.  The “Vermont Sovereignty Declaration” calls for the State of Vermont to reaffirm (1) its right of sovereignty, (2) its right to nullify acts of the central government deemed to be unconstitutional, (3) its right to secede from the Union, and (4) its right to call a statewide convention of the People to decide whether or not it remains in the Union.

On April 27, 2006, SVR held a legislative briefing on Vermont independence in the State House in Montpelier for legislators.  The meeting was well attended and a lively discussion ensued.

In August 2006 SVR ceased being a membership organization and evolved into a think tank and citizens’ network.

On November 3-5, 2006 the Middlebury Institute hosted the first North American Convention on Secession in Burlington, Vermont.  Delegates from eighteen states attended including representatives from Texas, Alaska, Louisiana, Hawaii, California, New Hampshire, and Tennessee to mention only a few.  Kirkpatrick Sale was the keynote speaker.

In April 2007 the Center for Rural Studies of the University of Vermont released the results of its annual “Vermonter Poll” showing that thirteen percent of the eligible voters in Vermont support secession, up from eight percent a year earlier.  An astonishing 74.3 percent of Vermont voters expressed the view that the U.S. government had lost its moral authority.  A year later that percentage had jumped to 77.1.

On June 3, 2007 the Associated Press released a piece entitled “In Vermont, Nascent Secession Movement Gains Traction.”  The article was picked up worldwide by hundreds of newspapers, websites, radio stations, and TV stations.  As a result SVR founder Thomas H. Naylor was interviewed by Fox News three times within two days including an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor.  The SVR website received over 25,000 unique visits that month.

On October 3-4, 2007, the Second North American Secessionist Convention took place in Chattanooga, TN.  The convention attracted delegates representing secessionist organizations in 36 states.  The convention received worldwide media attention as a result of an AP story which described the meeting as bringing “the far left and the far right of American politics together.”

On November 7, 2008 SVR sponsored the Second Statewide Convention on Vermont Independence in the House Chamber of the State House in Montpelier.  The convention took the form of an all-day forum, circus, and medicine show entitled “The Vermont Village Green: Alternative to Empire.”  It consisted of a potpourri of radical music, art, theater, circus, conversation, politics, and community aimed at fomenting a Genteel Revolution against the American Empire.  Participants included trends forecaster Gerald Celente, New Mexico writer Chellis Glendinning, Alaskan Independence Party leader Lynette Clark, Bread & Puppet Theater, folk musician Pete Sutherland, peak oil writer James Howard Kunstler, Rural Vermont leader Amy Shollenberger, UVM student Tyler Wilkinson-Ray, and Kirby businessman Dennis Steele.  A new grass roots Vermont independence group was launched by Mr. Steele.

The following week the Third North American Secessionist Convention took place in Manchester, New Hampshire on November 14-15.

On May 22, 2009, Kirby businessman Dennis Steele launched Radio Free Vermont, an Internet radio station devoted exclusively to playing music produced by Vermont artists.  Today Radio Free Vermont has listeners in over 130 countries.

The Second Vermont Republic issued 500 SVR Scott Nearing 50 clover silver tokens in October of 2009 for those contributing financially to the Vermont independence movement.  The tokens contained one ounce of .999 fine silver.  The limited supply of tokens was sold out within a few months.

On January 15, 2010, Vermont Independence Day, ten secessionists announced their candidacy for the November 2nd election including candidates for Governor, Lt. Governor, seven Senate seats, and one House seat.  Dennis Steele and Peter Garritano, our candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor respectively, each ran third in their statewide races.

Time magazine named SVR one of the “Top 10 Aspiring Nations” in the world in January 2011.  Matt Cropp and Dan Murphy launched the Vermont Independence Alliance, a statewide grass roots political organization in July 2011.

Thomas H. Naylor

August 1, 2011

Eight Years of SVR

EVENTS

October 11, 2003 – SVR holds first statewide meeting at Bread & Puppet Theater in Glover, VT.

June 19, 2004 – Parade in downtown Montpelier with Bread & Puppet followed by State House rally attended by 350 people.  Vermont declares independence.

November 5-7, 2004 – SVR and the Fourth World sponsor an international conference on “After the Fall of America, Then What?”  The Middlebury Institute is launched.

January 15, 2005 – SVR celebrates Vermont Independence Day at the Langdon Street Café in Montpelier.

March 4, 2005 – SVR holds a memorial service to commemorate the day in 1791 when Vermont joined the Union.

April 22, 2005 – Award-winning journal Vermont Commons is launched.

April 2005- Vermont Legislature adopts resolution naming January as Vermont History and Independence month.

June 3-5, 2005 – SVR officially represented at the fifteenth national Congress of the Parti Québécois in Quebec City.

October 28, 2005 – SVR holds first statewide convention on secession in the U.S. since 1861.  The event takes place in the House Chamber of the State House and is attended by 300 people.

April 27, 2006 – SVR holds Legislative briefing in State House.

August 2006 – SVR transitions into a think tank and citizens’ network.

November 3-5, 2006 – Middlebury Institute holds First North American Secessionist Convention in Burlington, VT.  The convention attracts delegates from 16 secessionist organizations in 18 states.

April 12, 2007 – UVM Center for Rural Studies releases results of its annual “Vermonter Poll” showing that thirteen percent of eligible voters in Vermont support secession, up from eight percent a year earlier.

June 3, 2007 – Associated Press releases a piece entitled “In Vermont, Nascent Secession Movement Gains Traction.”  Article is run worldwide by hundreds of newspapers, websites, radio stations, and TV stations.

June 4-5, 2007 – SVR founder Thomas H. Naylor is interviewed by Fox News three separate times including The O’Reilly Factor.

October 3-4, 2007 – Second North American Secessionist Convention takes place in Chattanooga, TN.  Representatives from thirty states attend.  It too receives  worldwide media attention.

November 7, 2008 – Second Statewide Convention on Vermont Independence in the House Chamber of the State House in Montpelier.

November 14-16, 2008 – Third North American Secession Convention in Manchester, NH.

May 22, 2009 – Dennis Steele launches Radio Free Vermont, a Vermont based music Internet station.

October 6, 2009 – SVR issues Scott Nearing 50 clover silver token.

January 15, 2010 – Ten secessionists announce their candidacy for the November 2nd election including candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor, seven Senate seats, and one House seat.

January 10, 2011 – SVR named one of the “Top 10 Aspiring Nations” in the world by Time magazine.

July 1, 2011 – Vermont Independence Alliance launched.

MEDIA ATTENTION

StateTimes-Argus, Rutland Herald, Burlington Free Press, Seven Days, Brattleboro Reformer, Vermont Life, Vermont Magazine, Channel 3 News, Channel 5 News, Vermont Public Television, VPR.

NationalThe New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Christian Science Monitor, The New Yorker, Utne, Ode, American Conservative, Orion, Chronicles, Boston Globe, Salon.com, Good, CounterPunch, Slate.com, Huffington Post,  The Nation, Fox News, NPR, NECN, CNN, and dozens of radio stations worldwide.

InternationalLe Devoir (Canada), Montreal Gazette, Der Tagesspiegel (Berlin), La Van Guardia (Spain), El Mundo (Spain), Le Courrier (Switzerland), CBC Radio (Canada), Radio Canada, BBC Radio (UK), TV GLOBO (Brazil), and Russia Today.

WEBSITES

www.vermontrepublic.org

www.vtcommons.org

www.radiofreevermont.org

www.middleburyinstitute.org

www.vtindependence.org

VERMONT COMMONS – Award-Winning Journal

RADIO FREE VERMONTVermont Based Music Internet Station

MIDDLEBURY INSTITUTE – National and International Outreach

VERMONT INDEPENDENCE ALLIANCE – Grass Roots Organization

Vermont Independence Alliance

By Matthew Cropp

Over the course of last year’s political season, I was fortunate to have had the opportunity to meet an enormous number of Vermonters who support our state’s political independence.  In my travels assisting Dennis Steele with his gubernatorial campaign, I came to find that such people come from all walks of life and, interestingly, from all political perspectives.  The breadth and depth of our movement’s diversity surprised and interested me; when I started with the campaign, I had assumed that most of our support would come from just one or two ideological camps.  Instead, I encountered among Vermont’s separatists a truly staggering array of beliefs and world-views; in our ranks we can count substantial numbers of libertarians, socialists, liberals, and conservatives, in addition to many folks whose innovative and thoughtful perspectives fall into no easily recognizable categories.

Such diversity comes with risks, and our movement has certainly seen its fair share of squabbling rooted in divergent political visions.  However, as we worked our way through those disputes, a possible consensus seems to have emerged which has the potential to transform our respective differences form a liability into a source of strength.  Essentially, it is this: though we may have very different visions for the nature of the society in which we would like to live, we recognize that none of our visions will receive a fair shake as long as we’re part of the United States.  The scale of the federal government and its empire is such that it is not, and cannot be reformed into, a forum for honest debate over the best interests of its constituents.  Instead, it is a machine for the perpetuation of the privilege of the well-connected and powerful, and has consistently taken their side against the interests of the average person.  In a free Vermont, on the other hand, our own political vision(s) might or might not be adopted, depending on the will of the people, but they’d certainly have the opportunity to be honestly considered and rationally debated.  Though we disagree on many things, we all desire, in the words of the Vermont Constitution, “government…instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community.”  The federal government is not, and is seemingly immune to attempts to reform it into, such a government; a free Vermont, on the other hand, could be.

Since the candidates for Vermont independence announced the start of their campaigns in January of 2010, the progress our movement has made has been remarkable.  However, we cannot afford to lose the momentum and connections that last year’s campaigns have brought us.  I believe it to be essential that, in the next few months, we begin the work of building a grassroots organization that can serve as the core of the movement for Vermont’s peaceful departure from the United States.  However, this cannot be a traditional political party along the lines of the Republicans, Democrats, or Progressives.  Rather, the Vermont Independence Alliance (VIA) must honor the aforementioned consensus not only in its platform, but in its very organizational structure.

Platform and structure

In terms of the platform, the organization should keep things simple; as soon as it attempts to specifically define what a free Vermont would look like, it will begin alienating potential supporters and weakening its ability to achieve its primary goal.

The VIA should confine itself to three simple principles:

First, that its members agree that Vermonters deserve to live in an independent Vermont and the organization will strive to advance that goal.

Second, that Vermonters deserve to have their views fairly represented in the government, and the group will work to achieve electoral reforms aimed at demolishing the structural barriers that sustain the two-party duopoly.

Third, it should honor the fact that independence is inextricably tied to greater responsibility, by sponsoring and supporting service projects designed to meet local needs with local resources and contribute to the increased independence of Vermont’s communities from centralized authority.

To realize this vision, VIA’s structure should emerge in a grassroots, bottom-up manner.  To start with, committees of interested Vermonters will be organized on a county wide basis and subsequently elect officers responsible for organizing activities and campaigns in their respective counties.  At a minimum, the officers will be expected to organize at least one membership meeting and one community-service activity on a bimonthly basis; ideally, those events will simply serve as the base upon which a great many other creative projects might be developed.  In election years, the county committees will have the option to democratically endorse candidates who are sympathetic to the organization’s aims, and will back up those endorsements with campaign volunteers and financial support.

Once committees on the county level are firmly established, they will federate into a statewide organization by adopting a constitution and bylaws and electing a state committee.  This latter group will be responsible for coordinating activities and campaigns that affect the whole of Vermont in a variety of ways.  This could include (but is certainly not limited to) providing support for statewide candidates who are endorsed by a vote of the membership, organizing a yearly state convention, and providing extra support to county committees as needed.

Once up and running, the Vermont Independence Alliance might effectively push forward the independence agenda in a number of ways.  By engaging in locally oriented service activities, we will help to make our communities more materially ready for independence and we’ll also have the opportunity to demonstrate the positive, constructive nature of our movement.  In this time of increasing government austerity, our communities are experiencing a growing chasm between needs and the resources that are available to meet them.  By stepping in and helping to creatively fill some of those gaps with local resources, VIA will demonstrate to Vermonters that our movement means business and can get positive things done.

Also, by building a network of committed volunteers, VIA will force politicians to begin engaging with the ideas of the independence movement.  At the moment, it is easy for them to ignore us since there are minimal political consequences for doing so.  However, if we can muster the necessary human and financial resources to have an effect on the outcome of close local elections, candidates will have to sit up and take notice. Furthermore, such a network would allow the organization to provide a robust foundation in which independence-minded candidates might root their campaigns.  Given the amount of publicity and stir the handful of independence candidates were able to make in the last election on a shoestring, having such a resource in place would greatly increase the visibility and influence of our movement.

In addition to these obvious effects, the grassroots, democratic nature of VIA will create a space in which activists might engage in constant experimentation in search of better ways to advance our movement.  Some projects will fail while others succeed, but the lessons learned by one county can be communicated to the rest of the organization resulting in a stronger, more effective movement.  By bringing together the skills, perspectives, resources, and insights of the great diversity of people who make up the independence movement, VIA could serve as a big tent under which truly important work can be done.

If this appeals to you and you’d like to get involved, please head over to our website (www.vtindependence.org) and sign up.  As soon as your county receives a sufficient number of expressions of interest, a meeting will be organized and the work of the Vermont Independence Alliance will begin in earnest in your community.  Together, let’s take the next step on the path toward a Free Vermont!

This piece appeared in Vermont Commons (Summer 2011).  For additional information contact Matthew Cropp at carbonpenguin@yahoo.com.

Vermont Named One of the Top 10 Aspiring Nations by Time Magazine

The Second Vermont Republic has been named by Time Magazine as one of the “Top 10 Aspiring Nations” in the world.  Other regions appearing on the list include Scotland, the Basque Country, Tibet, South Ossetia, Kurdistan, Quebec, Western Sahara, New Cascadia, and Padania.

Short descriptions of each of the ten aspiring nations can be found on the website Time.com, January 10, 2011.  The piece about the Second Vermont Republic was written by Frances Romero.

Second Vermont Republic – Top 10 Aspiring Nations

By Frances Romero  Jan 10, 2011
Formed in 2003 by Duke University professor emeritus Thomas Naylor, the Second Vermont Republic bills itself as a “nonviolent citizens network” focused on independence for the state of Vermont and the dissolution of the Union. Why? Because of “the tyranny of corporate America and the U.S. government” and so that Vermonters would not be, as  “forced to participate in killing women and children in the Middle East.” The group also wants Vermont to become dependent on family-owned farms and businesses so as not to rely on other states or countries to sustain itself. Their flag is similar in design to that of an earlier Vermont secessionist movement from the 18th century. Read more about the Second Vermont Republic’s motivations.

View the full list for “Top 10 Aspiring Nations”

The Vermont Patriot’s Pledge for Peace

As a Vermont patriot, I hereby pledge to work tirelessly to (1) bring home the Vermont National Guard troops; (2) stop all of the immoral, illegal wars in which the United States is engaged including those in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Palestine, Africa, and Latin America; (3) end the highly racist War on Terror; (4) close all of the American military bases located in over 150 countries outside the United States; (5) ban all nuclear weapons; (6) shutter the so-called missile defense program; (7) block the deployment of F-35 fighter jets at the Burlington International Airport; (8) prevent the nuclear weapons company Sandia Corporation from locating in Vermont; (9) resist any attempt by the Pentagon to locate a pilotless drone aircraft base in Vermont; and (10) discourage military contractors from moving to Vermont.

________________________________

Name

_________________________________

Date

Petition for a Free and Independent Vermont


Whereas the State of Vermont was constituted as an independent republic by the adoption of its Constitution on July 8, 1777, and remained such until it joined the United States in 1791,

Chapter I, Article 7 of the Constitution of the State of Vermont affirms:

That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the particular emolument or advantage of any single person, family, or set of persons, who are a part only of that community; and that the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right, to reform or alter government, in such manner as shall be, by that community, judged most conducive to the public weal.

The U.S. Federal Government has undermined the security of the People of Vermont through its policy of waging undeclared, aggressive wars across the globe.  Those wars have repeatedly been cause for the Vermont National Guard’s deployment half-way around the world, which has left the State woefully unequipped to ensure the safety of its citizens,

The U.S. Federal Government has consistently and unabashedly acted “for the particular emolument or advantage of any single person, family, or set of persons” through the corrupt pork-barrel spending of the Federal Budget, massive subsidies, and the bail-outs of politically well connected banks and other corporations,

The U.S. Federal Government has neglected its Constitutionally mandated duty to create money by surrendering that power to the quasi-private banking cartel known as the Federal Reserve System, of which it lacks the authority to even conduct an audit.  By surrendering the control of money creation to a secretive, unaccountable organization, the U.S. Federal Government has manifestly failed in its duty to provide for “the common benefit, protection, and security of the people,”

The “indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right, to reform or alter government” clearly reserves the People’s right, should they judge it beneficial, to return their State to its former status as an independent republic,

When the People of Vermont declare independence by secession or any other lawful means, it is a constitutionally protected act, not subject to review by the United States or its judiciary, military, police forces, legislative or executive branches,

Therefore We, the Undersigned, demand that the Governor and Legislature conduct a referendum on whether Vermont should again become a sovereign and independent nation.

______________________________________   ___________________________________________

Printed Name                                                                   Signature

______________________________________   ___________________________________________

Phone #

______________________________________   ___________________________________________
Address                                                                             Email

To Sign the Petition Online Click on Petition

OR

Please Return Completed Petitions To: Second Vermont Republic, P.O. Box 544, Charlotte, VT 05445

Breaking Away

Stories and Photos by Peter Miller, as published in Vermont Magazine

Breaking Away (pdf)

Independent Music and Independent Vermont Go Hand in Hand

www.7dvt.com/2010free-last

Announcing the Once and Future Vermont Republic’s New Silver Token

What might the medium of exchange of a free and independent Vermont look like? Just like the recently minted Second Vermont Republic’s Scott Nearing 50 Clover Silver Token.

Who in the world was Scott Nearing? Scott and Helen Nearing were political activists who lived in Jamaica, Vermont between 1932 and 1952 and embraced a political philosophy based on simple living, self-sufficiency, sustainable agriculture, cooperation, mutual aid, and radical anti-imperialism. Ironically, the two people most responsible for the change in Vermont’s political character during the last two decades of the twentieth century, Scott and Helen Nearing, had not lived in the state since 1952. Their 1954 book Living the Good Life became the Bible for the hundred thousand or so people who moved to Vermont between 1967 and 1973 searching for the good life. As a result of this mass in-migration, Vermont was transformed from the most Republican state in America to the most left-wing state.

As for the Nearing token itself, it contains one ounce of .999 fine silver and has a mirror-like proof finish. It is the first in a series of collectable SVR silver tokens. Future tokens may include the images of Ethan Allen, Fanny Allen, Helen Nearing, and Alexander Twilight. Collect them, barter them, use them, and enjoy them as you see fit.

Why clovers, the state flower, instead of dollars, pounds, or euros? As Voltaire once said, “Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value – zero.” With the Federal Reserve Bank printing fiat money as though it were going out of style, the value of such money can only spiral downward.

Why clovers? Why not? Why peg something of value (silver) to a rapidly declining asset (dollars)? Why not a fresh start with a new yet time tested medium of exchange? Clovers will trade at one to one vs the dollar – for now. Get yours today. Only 500 first strike pieces are currently available to those who contribute to the Second Vermont Republic. For each $50 you contribute to SVR you are entitled to one Nearing token.

Please send your check to:

Second Vermont Republic
P.O. Box 544
Charlotte, VT 05445

October 6, 2009
Freedom and Unity coinScott Nearing Coin

How Is America Going To End? Who’s most likely to secede? By Josh Levin

Slate.com article by Josh Levin August 5th, 2009